Install this theme

Posts tagged: white mythology

silent3:

throwingshadepodcast:

What year is this

x / x

There’s a reason I hated that sappy, watery, pathetic book. Now I know what it is.

woooooow

tantefledermaus:

fashionsfromhistory:

Evening Dress (Costume)

Travis Banton

1934 

An evocative and glamorous example of the work of Paramount Studios costume designer Travis Banton, who, during the 1930s, also dressed Marlene Dietrich, Carole Lombard, and Mae West, this dress was worn by Chinese-American actress Anna May Wong. While the dress may evoke the “cheongsam”, a from-fitting traditional Chinese dress style, its construction is along the lines of high-necked form-fitting Western gowns from the Belle-Epoque period, but the dragon motif adds a distinct Asian influence, dazzling in its execution in gold and silver sequins on luxurious satin. It was designed by Banton for Wong’s role of Tu Tuan in the 1934 film “Limehouse Blues.” Wong was a pioneer for Asian-American actors and one of the few actors in general to transition from silent to talking films. (MET)

MET

Damn, that’s how a movie star should dress.

no

this is a dress designed by a white man for a chinese woman that echoes her culture’s fashion, but //isn’t// - and it has a dragon on it bc tribute i guess

anna may wong spoke out //in the thirties// about her perpetual typecasting and how she only got stereotypical and racist parts, but it was that or no work and those parts played by white women

uncritically saying she was ‘a pioneer’ for asian-american actors and praising the ‘chinese influence’ in this dress is whitewashing the fuck out of her actual life and times

twd’s steven yuen is developing his own material because that’s easier than getting offered a decent part, john cho spent the whole star trek into darkness promo cycle calling team abrams out on whitewashing khan (and the rest of their shitty future), and hollywood is making a ghost in the shell movie and courting //scarlett johansson// for motoko kusanagi

anna may wong was a badass and endured all this open racism with grace and eloquent protest, but her complaints about her time in hollywood are still valid eighty years later. how dare you shrug all that off so you can non-critically praise the orientalism inherent in this dress

king-emare:

queen-mzbigabootie:

haneefistheonlyone:

kwamejaw:

Im pretty sure I walk past a lot more cops than that





word

king-emare:

queen-mzbigabootie:

haneefistheonlyone:

kwamejaw:

Im pretty sure I walk past a lot more cops than that

image

word

blackfangirlsunite:

killbenedictcumberbatch:

halloweevee:

halloweevee:

Ok guys can we have a chat about coding?

Coding is when characteristics of certain people/groups are applied to entities in media, oftentimes nonhuman characters. This is often a sort of subtle allegory to make a point or present a counterpart in a fantasy setting. Sometimes it takes the form of “monster culture,” where these stereotypical characteristics are applied to villains to demonize certain groups (you see this a lot with villains who take on stereotypical traits of marginalized groups such as LGBT people, or Jewish people for example). Sometimes it’s simply allegory.

Let’s look at these images as examples. Garnet is an alien with brown skin, an afro, and voiced by black english singer Estelle. So, it’s clear to see she’s coded as a black woman in spite of being an alien. The picture next to that is from the PBS kids show Arthur, portraying two characters in Senegal. They’re clearly animals, but they’re also Senegalese, so it can be inferred they’re coded as black Africans. They are relatives of another character on the show, The Brain, who is a bear. But in the show, he has family in Africa, and celebrates kwanzaa. It can be inferred he’s black as well.

Then Sagwa. This is about a family of siamese cats who lives in China sometime around the era of the Qing dynasty (I believe). They work for a magistrate and make calligraphy with their tails. They’re cats, but are coded by their environment and characterization as being Chinese. 

And the list goes on (The Between the Lions lions being African, Rosita and Quetzal being Mexican, etc)

So there’s a problem when you see a character like Garnet and go “she’s not black, she’s a gem!” Sure, in a literal sense. But she’s clearly CODED as a black woman. 

This ALSO plays into why you can’t arbitrarily assign certain coding to certain things and not take context and connotations into account. 

I hope this made sense.

yeah but they don’t have to be mexicanthey could be cuban or spanish or brazilianpls don’t catagorize all of the hispanics to just mexican.”

an understadable issue but!! i say mexican specifically for a reason

quetzal is named after the Aztec deity quetzalcoatl and has been referred to as having mexican coding on other sites such as the show’s wikipedia page. and if memory serves the show’s two main human characters are also canonically mexican.

rosita is much more clear cut, specifically stated in sesame street canon to be a monster who comes from mexico. 

thank u for this

This all of this

how in the hell could anyone even try to claim garnet is not black

prokopetz:

sarahtypeswords:

wetorturedsomefolks:

memejacker:

several-talking-corpses:

memejacker:

caligula had anime eyes

wait romans painted their marble sculptures
it looks like a cheap theme park ride mascot

yep
here’s a statue of Augustus

and here’s a reproduction of the statue with the colors restored 


i honestly think that what we consider the height of sculpture in all of Western civilization being essentially the leftover templates of gaudy pieces of theme park shit to be evidence of the potential merit of found art

"I tried coloring it and then I ruined it"

And you know what the funniest part is? The paint didn’t just wear off over time. A bunch of asshole British historians back in the Victorian era actually went around scrubbing the remaining paint off of Greek and Roman statues - often destroying the fine details of the carving in the process - because the bright colours didn’t fit the dignified image they wished to present of the the cultures they claimed to be heirs to. This process also removed visible evidence of the fact that at least some of the statues thus stripped of paint had originally depicted non-white individuals.
Whenever you look at a Roman statue with a bare marble face, you’re looking at the face of imperialist historical revisionism.
(The missing noses on a lot of Egyptian statues are a similar deal. It’s not that the ancient Egyptians made statues with strangely fragile noses. Many Victorian archaeologists had a habit of chipping the noses off of the statues they brought back, then claiming that they’d found them that way - because with the noses intact, it was too obvious that the statues were meant to depict individuals of black African descent.)

prokopetz:

sarahtypeswords:

wetorturedsomefolks:

memejacker:

several-talking-corpses:

memejacker:

caligula had anime eyes

wait romans painted their marble sculptures

it looks like a cheap theme park ride mascot

yep

here’s a statue of Augustus

and here’s a reproduction of the statue with the colors restored 

i honestly think that what we consider the height of sculpture in all of Western civilization being essentially the leftover templates of gaudy pieces of theme park shit to be evidence of the potential merit of found art

"I tried coloring it and then I ruined it"

And you know what the funniest part is? The paint didn’t just wear off over time. A bunch of asshole British historians back in the Victorian era actually went around scrubbing the remaining paint off of Greek and Roman statues - often destroying the fine details of the carving in the process - because the bright colours didn’t fit the dignified image they wished to present of the the cultures they claimed to be heirs to. This process also removed visible evidence of the fact that at least some of the statues thus stripped of paint had originally depicted non-white individuals.

Whenever you look at a Roman statue with a bare marble face, you’re looking at the face of imperialist historical revisionism.

(The missing noses on a lot of Egyptian statues are a similar deal. It’s not that the ancient Egyptians made statues with strangely fragile noses. Many Victorian archaeologists had a habit of chipping the noses off of the statues they brought back, then claiming that they’d found them that way - because with the noses intact, it was too obvious that the statues were meant to depict individuals of black African descent.)

asks:
Of course there was poc in middle aged Europe! How else would we have gotten small pox and the black plague? XD

medievalpoc:

First of all, “middle aged Europe”

Second of all, your understanding of epidemiology would be laughable if it wasn’t just an excuse to say a racist thing. Well, congratulations. You’ve said a racist thing. Ha ha, people of color spread diseases. Super hilarious.Hmm, maybe if you want to learn more about how “small pox” is spread, take a look in here

image

[x]

do they think it’s called the black plague bc … oh jesus christ they do don’t they

superselected:

#IamaLiberianNotaVirus. A Call To End Ebola Stigmatization and Prejudice.MORE.

superselected:

#IamaLiberianNotaVirus. A Call To End Ebola Stigmatization and Prejudice.

MORE.

Anonymous
asks:
are you kidding me? how is that max moxxi cosplay not whiteface?

boo-author:

Oh, I’d guess it probably is whiteface, which is what the white base that clowns wear is called. If I wanted to dress up like Moxxi, I’d wear whiteface, too. The character canonically wears similar make-up, as some sort of mash-up of harlequin and the “arsenic chic” of past ages, to go with Moxxi’s general retro-futurism vibe. 

Of course, the term “whiteface” in reference to this type of makeup, like the term “blackface”, originated as a purely descriptive term for a type of theatrical cosmetic application. The difference is that while the latter is linked to a tradition of murderous dehumanization and cultural exploitation, the former was primarily associated with the clown who was the boss of the other clowns, those other clowns often being painted (I mean, literally painted) as demeaning racist caricatures with exaggerated features that verged on literal blackface, if they didn’t include it.

Or to put it another way: both blackface and whiteface were used by white entertainers in ways that enforced white supremacy.

But I feel like that’s going beyond the scope of your question. Was there something in particular you were driving at?

tldr clowns are racist and if you’re afraid of clowns you’re afraid of racist caricatures of black people

maybe you can spin that as being afraid of racism, but probably not

Why is it that people are willing to spend $20 on a bowl of pasta with sauce that they might actually be able to replicate pretty faithfully at home, yet they balk at the notion of a white-table cloth Thai restaurant, or a tacos that cost more than $3 each? Even in a city as “cosmopolitan” as New York, restaurant openings like Tamarind Tribeca (Indian) and Lotus of Siam (Thai) always seem to elicit this knee-jerk reaction from some diners who have decided that certain countries produce food that belongs in the “cheap eats” category—and it’s not allowed out. (Side note: How often do magazine lists of “cheap eats” double as rundowns of outer-borough ethnic foods?)

Yelp, Chowhound, and other restaurant sites are littered with comments like, “$5 for dumplings?? I’ll go to Flushing, thanks!” or “When I was backpacking in India this dish cost like five cents, only an idiot would pay that much!” Yet you never see complaints about the prices at Western restaurants framed in these terms, because it’s ingrained in people’s heads that these foods are somehow “worth” more. If we’re talking foie gras or chateaubriand, fair enough. But be real: You know damn well that rigatoni sorrentino is no more expensive to produce than a plate of duck laab, so to decry a pricey version as a ripoff is disingenuous. This question of perceived value is becoming increasingly troublesome as more non-native (read: white) chefs take on “ethnic” cuisines, and suddenly it’s okay to charge $14 for shu mai because hey, the chef is ELEVATING the cuisine.

One of the entries from the list ‘20 Things Everyone Thinks About the Food World (But Nobody Will Say)’. (via crankyskirt)

Glad this is floating its way back around ^_^

I had to delete the original post after a bunch of notes from people who reblogged with faulty logic (“I went to a [insert non-white ethnicity here] restaurant and they totally ripped me off because I wasn’t [that ethnicity], so there”) or comments like the ones in the quote itself.

I still think about this, especially given the real-estate crunch in NYC thanks to gentrification, that entails not only the way buildings’ space is allocated, but also who gets to put out their food truck in a given area.

Some foodie writer wrote this list of things he’d learned as a critic, and one of them was about how great the little out-of-the-way mini-mall spots were for discovering delicious, homemade-style ethnic cuisine. I wish I’d written to him and asked, “It’s all well and good that you’re able to travel to the boondocks for the perfect Thai meal in the US, but why is it that you’re not talking about a middle ground, where those small business owners get enough press that they can move to a venue that both serves their original clientele and feed foodies like you from metro areas?”

(via so-treu)

Anonymous
asks:
I worry that there's no way for me as a white person who is trying to be more critical of whiteness to ever not be racially problematic, and that regardless of how accountable i try to be i will always feel as though i am marginalizing POC.

spookyfluffaloforbossofmybutt:

I mean maybe, but accountability is a process & not a destination, so.

speaking as a white person there is no cure, you just have to accept the bitter reality of inherited privilege, and realize that your personal best will never be good enough to undo centuries of colonialism and white supremacy

xtremecaffeine:

Sometimes I hate Tumblr.

Other times, I love Tumblr.

Times like this, I hate the fact that when I go away from Tumblr, I’ve forgotten that, no, people are still pieces of shit, there are people I will come into contact with, who will defend Blackface.

Yellow is myself (appropriately enough)
Blue is my amazing wife (who is, along with every other person taking part in this conversation, white. This is important to the story.)

Every other colour is a racist-ass piece of shit. Aside from Dark Green there who’s alright. 

These cracker-ass honky-ass birdshit-ass motherfuckers want to sit there and say, y’know, it’s not racist. My wife wants to point out the fact - not the opinion, the fact - that Blackface is, indeed, racist. She is apparently disqualified from passing on this knowledge as she is white - but it’s okay to be white and say it’s not racist?

And because I do have even a smidgen of savvy w/ regard to race, I get called an SJW, and challenged to defend my argument - without, y’know, mentioning the fact that Blackface is objectively racist or, in fact, using the word “racist" at all.

So yeah, this is some FUCKING EGREGIOUS SHIT and I am pissed as hell.

jfc

thehappiestdoughgirl:

whowasminein99:

this will be my child

#indigenouspeoplesday

saberspinner:

slayyyy herrrrrrrr