Install this theme

Posts tagged: white mythology

it’s funny bc they’re ‘urban, of all races’. that makes it okay bc we’re only laughing at their socioeconomic status and cultural background, not their //race//.

The thing that sucks about Girls and Seinfeld and Sex and the City and every other TV show like them isn’t that they don’t include strong characters focusing on the problems facing blacks and Latinos in America today. The thing that sucks about those shows is that millions of black people look at them and can relate on so many levels to Hannah Horvath and Charlotte York and George Costanza, and yet those characters never look like us. The guys begging for money look like us. The mad black chicks telling white ladies to stay away from their families look like us. Always a gangster, never a rich kid whose parents are both college professors. After a while, the disparity between our affinity for these shows and their lack of affinity towards us puts reality into stark relief: When we look at Lena Dunham and Jerry Seinfeld, we see people with whom we have a lot in common. When they look at us, they see strangers.

Hipster Racism Runoff And The Search for The Black Costanza by Cord Jefferson @ Gawker

When they look at us, they see strangers.

(via darkdarkgirlvashti)

I was trying to find this quote recently. I don’t think most white people understand how it feels to be thought of as only as a dehumanized stereotype or a token. Never as someone like you who can be relatable and have things in common with you. It’s always a surprise to people online and offline when people find out that I like things that they do, too ; that I’m not just some angry activism-obsessed woman. When people like Lena Dunham  say they don’t know how to write Black people, it’s pretty much saying that she doesn’t think that Black people are also fully complex human beings like her. Sure, there are cultural considerations to be made, but it’s ignoring the fact that people of color are diverse and not a monolith, so it’s not like the only girls who are like her are white.

(via wretchedoftheearth)

I first saw this like a week ago and I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it.

(via rosalarian)

girljanitor:

karnythia:

thehoneyinthelion:

girljanitor:

thehoneyinthelion:

menophiliac:

girljanitor:

innocent-bystanders-inc:

nudiemuse:

princelesscomic:

girljanitor:

Self Evident Truths

S. Ross Browne

Ummm…I am so VERY into this right now!

But Black people in period or fantasy settings totally makes the stories unreal.

Also holy shit I love these.

How come I don’t run across this stuff regularly?

Because of racism and the retroactive erasure of POC in Medieval Europe. Pretty much the same reason you almost never see these works of art either unless you’re already looking for them:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

um yes

almost all of those pictures are recognisably early modern tho 

i mean yeah there’s an amphora  and a couple of classical-looking statues in the collage one but apart from that they look late-c15th at most like

it’s a gr8 bunch of artworks but it doesn’t look medieval sry

you know, I’m fucking sick and tired of people thinking I don’t know what I’m talking about. Did you notice that the DATE 1744 is right ON one of the paintings I posted? Or maybe that a few of the “paintings” are actually urns and sculptures that date well before the Medieval era? I swear to fucking god you people

image

Koninklijke Bibliotheek Den Haag Hours of the Virgin: Sext

circa 1300s

image

Heironymus Bosch circa 1490s

image

Armorial de Gelre 1370 –1414

image

Gaudenzio Ferrari circa 1480s

image

Mostaert, circa 1480s or 90s

image

portrait of Alessandro de Medici, 1530s

image

Armorial of Gelre 1370-1395

image

Anonymous Adoration of the Magi c. 1450

image

Jean, Duc de Berry, about 1410

From Esther Schruder’s Essay ‘Propaganda and consolation: ‘blacks’ in court culture in the period 1300-1900′:

The first introduction to black people in the ‘Low Countries’ almost certainly occured between AD 200 and 500 when black Africans came to the region in the service of Roman armies.

Research at the University of Newcastle has revealed that black Romans were found in all ranks of the army and that most Roman armies were multi-ethnic. Some Roman emperors, such as Septimius Severus (145-211), were North African in origin. Severus probably marched through the Low Countries with his army in 209 and died in England in 211.

While he may not have been a black African himself, the Historia Augusta does mention a black Ethiopian who served in his army in England. Objects on which black Romans are depicted have also been found in England, although not in the Netherlands as far as is known.

In later Netherlandish art there are certainly many representations of black Romans and black Roman emperors.

The following phase in European history, the Middle Ages, is considerably more important in establishing the roles and image of black people at courts. From the eight century onwards there was a real danger that the Moors, or Muslims, who included many blacks amongst their numbers, would conquer and colonise Europe. They proved formidable opponents.

In subsequent centuries the Moors held sway over the Iberian peninsula, Sicily and Corsica. Both negative and positive representations of black people appear in northern European art and literature from this period of Moorish threat and conquest. Initially these images were chiefly negative, as in the Spiegel Historiaelby Jacob van Maerlant from circa 1330. ( picture Charlemagne )

Positive representations of black people were inspired by the crusaders’ discovery of Christian Ethiopians living in Jerusalem.

When it further emerged that both Ethiopia and Nubia were ruled by Christian kings who were also fighting the Muslims, European crusaders and potentates became increasingly interested in these two lands, believing that they had finally found strong black Christian allies to help them against the Moors.

This idea persisted in art. In Les Très Riches Heures du Jean Duc de Berry(c. 1416) for example, an illumination by the Limburg brothers features three realistic black monks at the foot of the holy cross.

Esther Schreuder

that is literally the exact point I was making, that maybe one or two of those artworks was actually medieval

i mean you were talking about “the retroactive erasure of POC in Medieval Europe”- that hardly made it clear that you knew those artworks weren’t medieval

your wording was very unclear, and considering the amount of people on this site that can’t distinguish between between medieval and early modern i was hardly going to give you the benefit of the doubt like

And yet now that you know Girljanitor knows exactly what the fuck they’re talking about you’re still determined to make this post about you and not the actual topic at hand. You should ask yourself why you feel the need to be pedantic and wrong instead of shutting the fuck up. Or apologizing. Or anything useful at all.

I didn’t even get into how eras in art history aren’t like rolling clay and cutting it off in chunks according to linear time period-they also exist in SPACE in regards to geographical origin, as well as styles and influence, and calling a painting this particular “style” isn’t the same as saying “it is from this year until this year”.

But I’m sure you can imagine why I don’t even fucking bother-the important thing is trying to undermine my supposed ~credibility~ because a thing is true that they obviously don’t like.

In one 1962 survey roughly 90 percent of White people believed Black children had an equally fair opportunity to get a quality education as White children. Wise recognizes that White Americans’ lack of awareness—and denial about the extent of racial inequality in America—is dated, calling it “borderline delusional”.

(Unpacking the Snowflake - Kevin M. Hemer)

In 1962—  before Civil Rights legislation, when Black people were literally having their houses bombed for moving into white neighborhoods, and Black neighborhoods were being bombed in entirety for having nice houses, white people were literally releasing dogs on Black children (my parents) for walking to school, Black children and teenagers were literally leaving school to protest and then being arrested for demanding to be treated equally, police commissioners were driving through Black neighborhoods in tanks to instill fear in them for wanting to be treated equally, everything was separate with Black people getting the shittier end, they literally had lower education standards for Black schools and Black people were still getting lynched and the KKK was strong—

White people when surveyed said “there is equal opportunity“… So don’t think it’s weird that 93% or so of white people still think “there is equal opportunity” today. They’ve literally always been wrong and still are.

(via fuckyeahcracker)

This post isn’t about welfare, but it beautifully illustrates a point I’ve been making (or trying to make) since I started this blog:

Privileged people do not understand the realities of people who lack their privilege.

White people assume PoC have the same education and job opportunities.

People with permanent addresses assume homeless people can just fill out an application for McDonalds or Burger King, be hired, and immediately use their paychecks to secure housing.

People who don’t receive welfare assume people on welfare are lazy and intentionally having multiple children and not looking for jobs.

This is why I am always, always asking people if they’ve ever considered that maybe, JUST MAYBE, they don’t have the whole story about their cousin/neighbor/friend’s sister. Because people in privilege tend to ascribe their own circumstances to everyone, even when that’s the exact opposite of reality.

(via getoutofthewelfaretag)

re; my parents gave me money, but they also gave me tools.

logical-deduction:

tazeffect:

jazuthewasianprincess:

beeishappy:

TDS | 2013.05.13

AH, I HAVE DISCOVERED WHY I HATE YOUR GUTS.

He acts like Star Trek is no longer needed for its ability to address social issues, so now why not just turn it into a bright and shiny action flick and nothing else? Dizzy bastard.

He took a project on without really realizing what it meant to so many people. I’m not just talking about those “crazy” nerds that stand in lines at conventions for hours. I’m talking about Martin Luther King Jr., who begged Nichelle Nichols not to quit the show. I’m talking about the hundreds of men and women that joined the navy or airforce, worked in the space industry, or became astronauts because of Star Trek. He’s forgotten all those people. He didn’t have faith that Star Trek in its purest form could reach all people– because it never reached him. So he molded it into something very different to fit a societal standard of action movies that pervades Hollywood today. 

He missed that mark. And he pats himself on the back for it.

it’s the mlk / nichelle nichols bit that really hammers things home for me where jj dropped the ball on this franchise.

like, he wants it to be accessible popcorn entertainment without as much heady philosophy, i can get that, i can even get behind it to a point, except it’s also completely ridiculous coming out of his mouth bc //what do you think lost was jj//.  also this and the other gifset misses out the part where he says he finally got way into star trek during production and now loves it.  (though the preponderance of enterprise references and the dip in ambition between movies does remind me more of voyager playing it safe than ds9 taking risks, but paramount stopped believing in the idealism of the franchise themselves about fifteen years ago so that’s not even surprising.)

no, it’s the fact that uhura even //existing// was revolutionary in the eyes of martin luther king jr.  in //nineteen sixty seven//.

in 2009?  chekov being a russian dude wasn’t diversity.  five of the seven main cast being white males wasn’t diversity.  less than a third of the characters with names and dialogue being not-white-males wasn’t progress.  //half of the female characters dying// wasn’t progress.  the female uniforms being sexy sexy where the men get practical clothing was the //opposite// of progress.

and hey, they didn’t bother to mix up the core seven by making chekov a russian //girl// genius or bones idris elba or spock sendil ramamurthy or kirk katee sackhoff or whatever.  but it’s okay, that’s only seven characters out of an infinite canvas.  and they did another movie, they levelled up, they added nothing but diversity to the cast, right?

replaced tyler perry with peter weller.  kirk wakes up in bed with //literal japanese catgirl twins// who aren’t named or seen again.  all the poc and aliens are (still) background scenery.  there are women wearing something other than the sleeveless gogo skirt //but only in the background//.  the new villain, who was a man of color as strong, smart, and capable as kirk back in the 60s / 80s, is now a white man with a desi name.  8/10 of the major characters are still white men.  and the only character written as a person of color is //still// zachary quinto.

jj, this is my problem.  you have officially failed to represent the future as //better//.  you’ve adopted a ridiculous colorblind ideology that amounts to ignoring the varied experiences of not-white-males, but failed to pair it with //casting mostly or even just 50% not-white-males//.

in the future, men are still disproportionately represented in the workforce?  //white// men still dominate all the hierarchies of power?  the only important places on earth are in the usa and great britain?  less than half the named characters are women?  we have transfer students from other planets but there are only terrestrial minorities in crowd shots?  white people are a demographical minority worldwide //today// but don’t tell the future that?

in 2004 edward james olmos, talking about new galactica, commented that that was the first time we’d seen latinos in space.  //that shouldn’t still be true//.

As a white chick, I think I’ll pass but thanks. I’m so done with being told I’m evil because of my skin color.

underthestarssofaraway talking about n.k. jemisin’s the broken kingdoms 

someone told a lie one day.

“Somebody told a lie one day.

they couched it in language.

They couched it in language.

They made everything black ugly and evil.  Look in your dictionary and see the synonyms for the word black.

They made everything black ugly and evil.  Look in your dictionary and see the synonyms for the word black.

it's always something degrading, low, and sinister.

it’s always something degrading, low and sinister.

look at the world white, it's always something pure, high, clean.

Look at the word white.  It’s always something pure, high, clean.

well, i want to get the language right tonight.

Well, I want to get the language right tonight.”

[the mlk that’s never quoted]

The Racist Myth of MSG and ‘Chinese Restaurant Syndrome’

zuky:

satanic2chainz:

atriptothemorg:

zuky:

[snip]

Monosodium glutamate was first isolated from the seaweed kombu, commonly used in the Japanese broth dashi, by biochemist Kikunae Ikeda of the Tokyo Imperial University in 1908. He named its tasteumami because it differed from the five conventional flavours of sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and spicy. Ikeda patented his discovery and MSG became commercially available in 1909. It was found to enhance flavours with one third of the amount of sodium as traditional salt, i.e. sodium chloride. In this sense, monosodium glutamate is probably healthier than sodium chloride because it achieves flavour with reduced sodium levels.

MSG was immediately popular in Asia and became common in the North American food industry after World War II, used in baby food, canned soup, vegetable juice, frozen food, as well as seasoning mix brands such as Accent. Yet somehow in the 1960s, this popular food additive became associated with Chinese food and deemed a health hazard. Why? Because Chinese people, culture, and food have been targeted by widespread and effective racist hate campaigns in North America since the 19th century, buttressed by wild claims that the Chinese are “unclean”, carry diseases, are sexually-deviant opium addicts, inscrutable and sneaky, a Yellow Peril. 

[snip]

Oh wow. This is so bananas. I’m gonna go ahead and buy me some MSG. 

Zuky, I’m glad you posted this. The other night I was getting takeout and the spot has a huge “ABSOLUTELY NO MSG” sign in the window and I was really confused because I never see anyone else advertising their food that way. Now I know why.

Exactly, only Chinese restaurants are forced to put up those humiliating “NO MSG” signs, in response to the widespread racist perception of, precisely, Chinese Restaurant Syndrome. They might as well also put up a sign saying “NO CAT OR DOG OR RAT MEAT SERVED HERE, ALSO NO OPIUM DEN OR DRAGON LADY PROSTITUTE.”

Italian restaurants? French? Japanese? No disclaimers required. There’s MSG in both the dashi broth and miso paste in miso soup but you rarely hear people complaining of miso soup headaches. In fact the “NO MSG” signs are kind of bullshit anyway because there’s naturally occurring MSG in soy sauce and I doubt they’ve stopped using soy sauce. As I mentioned earlier, there’s MSG in human breast milk, so frankly it’s pretty hard to avoid.

whitewhine:

Happy Mother’s Day!

From WhiteWhine’s worst children

well that should teach me to try to have a rational argument in youtube comments on a video protesting racism in harry potter.

jackpowerx:

acornfarm:

defilerwyrm:

AHAHAHA NOT QUITE, OP, NOT QUITE


FUCKING NAILED IT

A+ commentary!

also bc of this:

[xkcd :: how it works]
bc the white dude telling a white dude ‘you’re worthless’ meant ‘you, personally, are worthless’ whereas the white dude telling a black dude ‘you’re worthless’ meant ‘you, and all other black people, are worthless’

jackpowerx:

acornfarm:

defilerwyrm:

AHAHAHA NOT QUITE, OP, NOT QUITE

FUCKING NAILED IT

A+ commentary!

also bc of this:

xkcd - how it works

[xkcd :: how it works]

bc the white dude telling a white dude ‘you’re worthless’ meant ‘you, personally, are worthless’ whereas the white dude telling a black dude ‘you’re worthless’ meant ‘you, and all other black people, are worthless’

thegoddamazon

Anonymous asked:

Wait what does ex-pat even mean? Sorry for the -probably dumb- question but English isn’t my first language and I really haven’t got a clue what it means.

The Wiki article gives a long detailed history about the word “expatriate” but really it has just become another synonym for “ordinary white folks living like kings in POC countries”.
There were tons of those in Nigeria and I hated every last one of them. A few of them forgot that I was an American citizen too because I am Nigerian and tried to get at me in a fetishizing way and I wanted to puke because these are 30 year old white men going to other countries to live like kings where they otherwise wouldn’t in their home country and just…ugh.
Anyway, the word is one white people use to describe themselves living in other countries…meanwhile they call anyone who does that in America an “illegal immigrant”.

thegoddamazon

Anonymous asked:

Wait what does ex-pat even mean? Sorry for the -probably dumb- question but English isn’t my first language and I really haven’t got a clue what it means.

The Wiki article gives a long detailed history about the word “expatriate” but really it has just become another synonym for “ordinary white folks living like kings in POC countries”.

There were tons of those in Nigeria and I hated every last one of them. A few of them forgot that I was an American citizen too because I am Nigerian and tried to get at me in a fetishizing way and I wanted to puke because these are 30 year old white men going to other countries to live like kings where they otherwise wouldn’t in their home country and just…ugh.

Anyway, the word is one white people use to describe themselves living in other countries…meanwhile they call anyone who does that in America an “illegal immigrant”.

princessnijireiki:

aiffe:

moniquill:

pyrefly-skies:

austryzor:

moniquill:

yourfriendlyscop:

austryzor:

moniquill:

reblooged:

pilgrimofsjg:

globalsoftpirka:

fuckyeahcomicsbaby:

Getting a Job in a Nutshell

Currently quite relevant

People think I am crazy when I talk about this.

Every job in the history of the world.Reblooged~?

THIS LOOKS LIKE A JOB FOR….LYING!

What? NO! This is a job for volunteering.
You want to work in a cafe, but don’t have any experience (thus they won’t hire you)? Volunteer at a cafe. You’ll then get experience in a cafe that you can put on a resume.
BAM! Experience needed to work at a cafe.

how many cafes in the us are looking for volunteers

Seriously let me address the above because it is some bullshit.
You are telling people to do work for free. Disregarding how they’re going to obtain food and shelter in the meantime.
Fun fact: The place you want to work? Will train you anyway. Even if you have all the experience in the world, they will generally make you go through training to fit the needs of their institution - how THEIR coffee machine works, how to make THEIR recipes, how to run THEIR register - because if you haven’t worked at that specific store before, you don’t know any of that.
So the idea that having a ton of experience at certain jobs is kind of bullshit. Making coffee isn’t something that requires critical analysis or wisdom or experience. You can lie about that shit.
The fact that jobs require you to have experience for entry-level shit is, indeed, a form of gate-keeping and needs to be dismantled. In the meantime, LIE.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
Lying is the absolute WORST thing you can do. If anybody finds out you lied about previous experience, that’s it, your professional career is OVER. This is ESPECIALLY true in the food service/culinary industry, because relatively speaking it is so small, and so tight knit, that if you fuck up, everybody in the industry in the area will know, and put you straight on the do-not-trust list. If you lied about having experience at Cafe Imagination to get a job at Cafe B, and your boss finds out, they’re not going to trust you, and they’re going to tell EVERYBODY.
Don’t kid yourself, they will check and confirm EVERY. SINGLE. THING you list. Every reference will be called, every indication of previous experience will be confirmed, and every single award and recognition will be checked.
And excuse me, but have you EVER operated an espresso machine? It is one of the most difficult aspects of running a cafe. Not everybody can make a latte, hell, a lot of people have a difficult time making basic COFFEE right. Maybe at Starbucks or Tim Hortons, where it’s all push-button : receive espresso, you’d be fine. A cafe, where you’ve got to grind the beans, clean the machines properly, measure water, steam milk, pour properly so you don’t make a mess is NOT the same thing, but the basics of any cafe operation are all the same. Any cafe you walk into will make espresso using pretty much the exact same method, just different technologies to do it.
Somebody looking to hire, even at entry level, would rather hire somebody they only have to spend a couple hours training on, rather than a day or longer. If you run Cafe X, and you have a choice of somebody with no experience, or somebody who volunteered at Cafe B for a week, who would you rather hire? The volunteer at least knows the basics of working behind the counter, you just have to quickly go over the operation of your machine, cash register, and your coffee-to-water ratio. The one with no experience will require a LOT more then that, and that costs time and money, which a cafe almost NEVER has. People seem to think that a cafe is a license to print money, it’s not, and whoever started that lie need to be hanged by their thumbs over a shark tank.
Also, volunteers? They have to be trained too. Whether you were hired or not, going through training is pretty much unpaid anyway. It figuratively makes NO difference if you volunteer at a place before applying for a job. No, volunteering won’t land you any income, but it WILL get you experience, and HAVING that experience will go a long way to getting and actual paying job.
Yes, the idea of forcing people to have previous experience to work an entry-level position is stupid, but that’s not the employer’s fault - they’re already losing money from so many different sources, that they usually can’t afford to train that many people. We’re talking about an industry where more than 5% profit gets you audited because you’re making way more than you should be. This is also an industry where fucking up can KILL PEOPLE.
The key point to remember here is that while volunteering isn’t the best thing (the best thing being a complete overhaul of capitalism as we know it), it’s better than lying, BECAUSE LYING IS THE WORST POSSIBLE THING.
DON’T. FUCKING. LIE!

I volunteered at a Pet Shop for about a month, and yeah, I’d rather had gotten paid there, but it helped me get experience to work with animals. Imagine if I had lied to get a job working with animals, I’d have been in way over my head. Experience is important, even if it’s just a little, it’s something to add to the resume. Lying gets you in trouble, not just for the people who hired you finding out (it’s pretty obvious when you don’t have the basic knowledge required, even if they train you, they’ll figure it out), but you can be a real danger to not only the customer, but to yourself and the people you work with.

See this is the part where I could totally say that I worked as a Barista for most of my college years, at Cafe Borders and at Au Bon Pain and at Starbucks… and that I got my first cafe job by saying ‘yes, I have totally worked in cafes before’ when I, in fact, had not (I had only previously worked clothing retail and as a lifeguard, a job that actually required training and certification and ACTUALLY had an element of public safety and legitimate responsibility involved, which making coffee generally does not - if you can fuck up coffee so bad that it’s fatal, you have some kind of horrid superpowers).
But that’s not really worth my time, as you are clearly far more invested in this discussion than I am, as evidenced by your willingness to write a giant rant about it.

Ahahaha people think you should VOLUNTEER for fucking FOOD SERVICE and RETAIL.
Like are they out of their fucking minds.
Do they not understand these are jobs no one wants to do. These are jobs people do to eat. These are jobs that do not pay enough to also cover rent on an apartment in the same geographic region as the job. These are industries that exploit and abuse their workers, that don’t give you your legally mandated breaks, that have to be constantly watched for labor violations like pressuring you to work off the clock, that wage emotional warfare on their employees. I’ve worked these jobs and been reduced to tears by my managers, and many other people I know have as well, when this was completely unnecessary. If they know you’re in even more financial distress than your co-workers, they will use this leverage to abuse you even more.
And you want me…to what, GIVE FREEBIES to these people?
When FREE LABOR is the industry standard, that’s exploitation. That’s not okay. You don’t get to fucking excuse it with capitalist pressure on the businesses because guess what, WORKERS HAVE ECONOMIC PRESSURES TOO. And workers are JUSTIFIED in doing whatever it takes, a fuck of a lot more than a business is. I care a lot less about a business’s bottom line than I do about people being able to feed their kids. Oh but the POOR BUSINESS having to take a WHOLE DAY to train someone, that’s so much worse than creating an environment where the lowest-paid workers are expected to WORK FOR FREE and there’s such a pool of disposable labor businesses can cite capitalist morality again and just exploit one after the other and hire no one.
RIGHT.
There’s just so many things wrong with this whole concept, I…I can’t even. I’ll lie, cheat and steal before I put a business’s interests before my own, because EVERY TIME I am dead last in their considerations. I know it’s their dream to not have to pay their workers at all, and they keep trying to figure out how to make that happen legally. Like fuck I’m going to give that to them.

First of all: #fwiw if you are financially stable and want to donate your time to a good cause that’s just grand #but do not wreck an already fucked-up economy for the desperate by volunteering for entry-level labor #MAKE that cafe fucking pay someone #a cafe is not a good cause #a soup kitchen is a good cause #go volunteer there.
YES, THIS.
Secondly: it is a trip and a half that this trend of “free labor until you are deserving of pay, apprentice! now go fetch me my mead” is a Thing and it is a Thing increasing in frequency and across the job spectrum. Alos a trip is that it’s a Thing that’s particularly being hailed, via American puritanical “suffering is nobility” + bootstraps rhetoric + a good dose of weirdly internalized Mr. Miyagi mysticism, as an “alternative”/”non-traditional” route to “legitimate” employment/a real “career” (vs. the “jobs” us regular schmos are stuck with) vs. academia— which, a) still pretty aggressively polices what types of labor are considered “skilled”/”real” labor and what routes to that labor are considered “appropriate”, and b) seems blissfully unaware and/or deliberately misleading in that “working for free” is hardly one path that doesn’t exist in the other.
See also: white collar “women’s” labor, female-majority internship positions, gender disparity in paid vs. unpaid internships in the white-collar world, etc., etc.
As the economy’s gotten worse, the kind of minimum wage (if that), previously-viewed-as-“unskilled,” undesirable jobs have become increasingly… desirable. Including by folks who would generally have other options, and who, for one reason or another, convinced themselves that they’re ironically slumming it by taking those positions, and then rebranding them as coveted niche craftsmans’ fields by appointing themselves (who else?) as gatekeepers of the fucking Golden Arches. While I can appreciate the comedy inherent in those logical gymnastics, that shit becomes a lot less funny when it’s my livelihood that gets shunted off in the changeover as waiters “with experience” cheerily sing along to Macklemore’s “Thrift Shop,” where I bought all my uniforms save one pair of work pants when my six-plus year old khakis breathed their threadbare last.
Thirdly: Meanwhile people also go around spreading myths about food service as so tightly knit that you will be caught if you lie on your resume, omg you are so screwed you’ll never work in this town again, and so on and so forth. Well, yeah, if you lie about being a fucking cook, sure. If you lie about having washed dishes professionally? No one gives a single fuck. An actual black mark in food service is, like, stealing other people’s tips, or arson. Not so much? Not actually knowing how to roll silverware.
Likewise, unless you specify on your resume that your new employer can ask your old ones for a reference, pretty much all they’re supposed to do is confirm your dates of employment.
Which brings me around to subpoint one: people lie on those things all the damn time. For much higher stakes than $7 an hour after taxes, because, hey, you might get fired, but you’re trying to put food on the table until then, and at least you can collect unemployment after if shit goes south. And more people don’t get caught than do, being real.
Subpoint two is that when/if that is the case, nepotism and craftily falsified information on resumes works wonders in job acquisition. You got a cousin with a different last name than you? Cool, they’re a former employer. Their sister got married and changed her name? All the better, now you got two. Oh, snap, and your brother just got promoted to a managerial position? Have him keep an eye out for entry level jobs and within a year or so he can pull strings to get you promoted into his old job, too.
And I find myself caring about that less and less as I get older, if only because when the price for lying is so much a potential risk, and more of an ethics issue that you may be able to fudge your way out of at that— particularly  in entry-level fields— and the alternative is a $0 price point on your time and labor? Spin that fucking roulette wheel, my money’s on black, son.
And I’m adding this as an entire separate point, even though it’s a response to overly job-specific derailing, but fourthly: don’t make me fucking laugh about barista positions as “elite.” I want one. I want the fuck out of one. I miss the work, I miss the tips, I miss the free coffee, and I miss that the place where I worked was relatively chill. Unfortunately for me, it’s a nice job to have, in a setting that’s also associated with the academic èlite, artist types, high-minded bourgeoisie, and prices excluding (or alienating) most social “Undesirables” from setting foot inside— and other people (remember those surprised-to-be-in-a-depression hipsters I mentioned?) have cottoned on to that as well.
Volunteers quickly become a liability in the morning rush, just in comped drinks and dropped scones and too much whipped cream alone, let alone if they injure themselves or if money should go missing, or even in the man-hours it takes away from one of your paid employee’s productivity in hawk-eying the new kid’s work. One of my coworkers? The one who ended up stalking me? Harassed my other coworkers for months to hire him as a barista in training, and, yeah, he pulled shitty espresso— most everybody does when they start out, and if it comes down to it, those are quick corrections that can be made if you’re observant enough— but his main issue was wasting food, giving shit to his friends for free/at a discount/off-menu because, hey, those ingredients are expensive and you’re fucking up inventory, and that he didn’t want to fucking clean at the end of the night. A hundred dollars went missing when he was cashiering, and one night he was counting out his drawer before the café closed and walked away from it with customers still in the shop. He lied to people and was a bully. That wasn’t because he was a new barista. It was because he felt entitled to a job he didn’t actually want to do on the basis of his hanging out a lot.
In fact, I was hired at the same time as him— with zero food prep experience, but plenty of cashiering work under my belt, and I drilled coffee recipes every day because I couldn’t afford to be fired, and I aggressively Googled and Wikipediaed and YouTubed and faked it as hard as I could until I knew what I was talking about. I was fast with change and most folks can’t taste dead shots in a glorified caramel milkshake, anyway, and I charmed my ass off and busted my chops, and, yeah, that was with nepotism involved, plus that I was willing and available to work Sundays and ass-long no-tipping closing shifts. In a mom and pop shop where nothing was push-button easy.
LIE. LIE. LIE. I would rather you lie at a chain store, especially if they’re taking this kind of attitude and they are a push-button operation, but seriously: if it comes down to it, you trained on different equipment, your recipes were different, your beans and syrups were different, your POS was actually touchscreen and this is an analog register, you worked at a Dunkin Donuts and did just press a button to steam milk, we called that drink a different name, you’re having an off day (believe it or not, even with experience, shit happens, hence the old applauding at bussers when they drop dishes joke). So you spill a carafe of coffee. That’s not a fireable offense, and even if it was, you have a job to be fired from, so you’re still one step ahead of “unemployed and unemployable.”
Whatever you do, don’t make other people their money for free (esp. when they may v. well also deny you any tips on the basis of your non-employment).
Miss me with that.



labor abuse / 

capitalism / 

poverty is violence / 

class warfare / 

big ass rant because i don’t want to go to my shitty min. wage customer svc. job today / 

that I DID need experience to get / 

and that WASN’T the job I applied for / 

bc since baristas are technically ”higher paid” / 

target’s sol’n is to take lower paid workers and shunt them into sbux w/o a raise instead / 

JUSTIFYING that on the BASIS of their LACK of training/”real” experience / 

…yeah / 

so even though i ended my last job TRAINING another barista WHOA PUT THAT GIRL ON A REGISTER / 

BC HEY CASHIER IS LISTED ON THIS RESUME / 

WHEN CONVENIENT TO OUR NEEDS SHE HAS (OR LACKS) EXPERIENCE!! / 

schrödinger’s cv / 

b l e g h /
yeeeeep.  when i was working at regal cinemas they kept asking if i wanted to be a projectionist and i always said no bc regal calls projectionists ‘booth managers’ because managers don’t have union mandated starting wages at double or better than minimum wage.  being a proj would have been an extra //twenty five cents an hour// with the added responsibility that if anything goes wrong in the booths //it is your responsibility//.  fuuuuuuck that.

princessnijireiki:

aiffe:

moniquill:

pyrefly-skies:

austryzor:

moniquill:

yourfriendlyscop:

austryzor:

moniquill:

reblooged:

pilgrimofsjg:

globalsoftpirka:

fuckyeahcomicsbaby:

Getting a Job in a Nutshell

Currently quite relevant

People think I am crazy when I talk about this.

Every job in the history of the world.

Reblooged~?

THIS LOOKS LIKE A JOB FOR….LYING!

What? NO! This is a job for volunteering.

You want to work in a cafe, but don’t have any experience (thus they won’t hire you)? Volunteer at a cafe. You’ll then get experience in a cafe that you can put on a resume.

BAM! Experience needed to work at a cafe.

how many cafes in the us are looking for volunteers

Seriously let me address the above because it is some bullshit.

You are telling people to do work for free. Disregarding how they’re going to obtain food and shelter in the meantime.

Fun fact: The place you want to work? Will train you anyway. Even if you have all the experience in the world, they will generally make you go through training to fit the needs of their institution - how THEIR coffee machine works, how to make THEIR recipes, how to run THEIR register - because if you haven’t worked at that specific store before, you don’t know any of that.

So the idea that having a ton of experience at certain jobs is kind of bullshit. Making coffee isn’t something that requires critical analysis or wisdom or experience. You can lie about that shit.

The fact that jobs require you to have experience for entry-level shit is, indeed, a form of gate-keeping and needs to be dismantled. In the meantime, LIE.

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

Lying is the absolute WORST thing you can do. If anybody finds out you lied about previous experience, that’s it, your professional career is OVER. This is ESPECIALLY true in the food service/culinary industry, because relatively speaking it is so small, and so tight knit, that if you fuck up, everybody in the industry in the area will know, and put you straight on the do-not-trust list. If you lied about having experience at Cafe Imagination to get a job at Cafe B, and your boss finds out, they’re not going to trust you, and they’re going to tell EVERYBODY.

Don’t kid yourself, they will check and confirm EVERY. SINGLE. THING you list. Every reference will be called, every indication of previous experience will be confirmed, and every single award and recognition will be checked.

And excuse me, but have you EVER operated an espresso machine? It is one of the most difficult aspects of running a cafe. Not everybody can make a latte, hell, a lot of people have a difficult time making basic COFFEE right. Maybe at Starbucks or Tim Hortons, where it’s all push-button : receive espresso, you’d be fine. A cafe, where you’ve got to grind the beans, clean the machines properly, measure water, steam milk, pour properly so you don’t make a mess is NOT the same thing, but the basics of any cafe operation are all the same. Any cafe you walk into will make espresso using pretty much the exact same method, just different technologies to do it.

Somebody looking to hire, even at entry level, would rather hire somebody they only have to spend a couple hours training on, rather than a day or longer. If you run Cafe X, and you have a choice of somebody with no experience, or somebody who volunteered at Cafe B for a week, who would you rather hire? The volunteer at least knows the basics of working behind the counter, you just have to quickly go over the operation of your machine, cash register, and your coffee-to-water ratio. The one with no experience will require a LOT more then that, and that costs time and money, which a cafe almost NEVER has. People seem to think that a cafe is a license to print money, it’s not, and whoever started that lie need to be hanged by their thumbs over a shark tank.

Also, volunteers? They have to be trained too. Whether you were hired or not, going through training is pretty much unpaid anyway. It figuratively makes NO difference if you volunteer at a place before applying for a job. No, volunteering won’t land you any income, but it WILL get you experience, and HAVING that experience will go a long way to getting and actual paying job.

Yes, the idea of forcing people to have previous experience to work an entry-level position is stupid, but that’s not the employer’s fault - they’re already losing money from so many different sources, that they usually can’t afford to train that many people. We’re talking about an industry where more than 5% profit gets you audited because you’re making way more than you should be. This is also an industry where fucking up can KILL PEOPLE.

The key point to remember here is that while volunteering isn’t the best thing (the best thing being a complete overhaul of capitalism as we know it), it’s better than lying, BECAUSE LYING IS THE WORST POSSIBLE THING.

DON’T. FUCKING. LIE!

I volunteered at a Pet Shop for about a month, and yeah, I’d rather had gotten paid there, but it helped me get experience to work with animals. Imagine if I had lied to get a job working with animals, I’d have been in way over my head. Experience is important, even if it’s just a little, it’s something to add to the resume. Lying gets you in trouble, not just for the people who hired you finding out (it’s pretty obvious when you don’t have the basic knowledge required, even if they train you, they’ll figure it out), but you can be a real danger to not only the customer, but to yourself and the people you work with.

See this is the part where I could totally say that I worked as a Barista for most of my college years, at Cafe Borders and at Au Bon Pain and at Starbucks… and that I got my first cafe job by saying ‘yes, I have totally worked in cafes before’ when I, in fact, had not (I had only previously worked clothing retail and as a lifeguard, a job that actually required training and certification and ACTUALLY had an element of public safety and legitimate responsibility involved, which making coffee generally does not - if you can fuck up coffee so bad that it’s fatal, you have some kind of horrid superpowers).

But that’s not really worth my time, as you are clearly far more invested in this discussion than I am, as evidenced by your willingness to write a giant rant about it.

Ahahaha people think you should VOLUNTEER for fucking FOOD SERVICE and RETAIL.

Like are they out of their fucking minds.

Do they not understand these are jobs no one wants to do. These are jobs people do to eat. These are jobs that do not pay enough to also cover rent on an apartment in the same geographic region as the job. These are industries that exploit and abuse their workers, that don’t give you your legally mandated breaks, that have to be constantly watched for labor violations like pressuring you to work off the clock, that wage emotional warfare on their employees. I’ve worked these jobs and been reduced to tears by my managers, and many other people I know have as well, when this was completely unnecessary. If they know you’re in even more financial distress than your co-workers, they will use this leverage to abuse you even more.

And you want me…to what, GIVE FREEBIES to these people?

When FREE LABOR is the industry standard, that’s exploitation. That’s not okay. You don’t get to fucking excuse it with capitalist pressure on the businesses because guess what, WORKERS HAVE ECONOMIC PRESSURES TOO. And workers are JUSTIFIED in doing whatever it takes, a fuck of a lot more than a business is. I care a lot less about a business’s bottom line than I do about people being able to feed their kids. Oh but the POOR BUSINESS having to take a WHOLE DAY to train someone, that’s so much worse than creating an environment where the lowest-paid workers are expected to WORK FOR FREE and there’s such a pool of disposable labor businesses can cite capitalist morality again and just exploit one after the other and hire no one.

RIGHT.

There’s just so many things wrong with this whole concept, I…I can’t even. I’ll lie, cheat and steal before I put a business’s interests before my own, because EVERY TIME I am dead last in their considerations. I know it’s their dream to not have to pay their workers at all, and they keep trying to figure out how to make that happen legally. Like fuck I’m going to give that to them.

First of all: #fwiw if you are financially stable and want to donate your time to a good cause that’s just grand #but do not wreck an already fucked-up economy for the desperate by volunteering for entry-level labor #MAKE that cafe fucking pay someone #a cafe is not a good cause #a soup kitchen is a good cause #go volunteer there.

YES, THIS.

Secondly: it is a trip and a half that this trend of “free labor until you are deserving of pay, apprentice! now go fetch me my mead” is a Thing and it is a Thing increasing in frequency and across the job spectrum. Alos a trip is that it’s a Thing that’s particularly being hailed, via American puritanical “suffering is nobility” + bootstraps rhetoric + a good dose of weirdly internalized Mr. Miyagi mysticism, as an “alternative”/”non-traditional” route to “legitimate” employment/a real “career” (vs. the “jobs” us regular schmos are stuck with) vs. academia— which, a) still pretty aggressively polices what types of labor are considered “skilled”/”real” labor and what routes to that labor are considered “appropriate”, and b) seems blissfully unaware and/or deliberately misleading in that “working for free” is hardly one path that doesn’t exist in the other.

See also: white collar “women’s” labor, female-majority internship positions, gender disparity in paid vs. unpaid internships in the white-collar world, etc., etc.

As the economy’s gotten worse, the kind of minimum wage (if that), previously-viewed-as-“unskilled,” undesirable jobs have become increasingly… desirable. Including by folks who would generally have other options, and who, for one reason or another, convinced themselves that they’re ironically slumming it by taking those positions, and then rebranding them as coveted niche craftsmans’ fields by appointing themselves (who else?) as gatekeepers of the fucking Golden Arches. While I can appreciate the comedy inherent in those logical gymnastics, that shit becomes a lot less funny when it’s my livelihood that gets shunted off in the changeover as waiters “with experience” cheerily sing along to Macklemore’s “Thrift Shop,” where I bought all my uniforms save one pair of work pants when my six-plus year old khakis breathed their threadbare last.

Thirdly: Meanwhile people also go around spreading myths about food service as so tightly knit that you will be caught if you lie on your resume, omg you are so screwed you’ll never work in this town again, and so on and so forth. Well, yeah, if you lie about being a fucking cook, sure. If you lie about having washed dishes professionally? No one gives a single fuck. An actual black mark in food service is, like, stealing other people’s tips, or arson. Not so much? Not actually knowing how to roll silverware.

Likewise, unless you specify on your resume that your new employer can ask your old ones for a reference, pretty much all they’re supposed to do is confirm your dates of employment.

Which brings me around to subpoint one: people lie on those things all the damn time. For much higher stakes than $7 an hour after taxes, because, hey, you might get fired, but you’re trying to put food on the table until then, and at least you can collect unemployment after if shit goes south. And more people don’t get caught than do, being real.

Subpoint two is that when/if that is the case, nepotism and craftily falsified information on resumes works wonders in job acquisition. You got a cousin with a different last name than you? Cool, they’re a former employer. Their sister got married and changed her name? All the better, now you got two. Oh, snap, and your brother just got promoted to a managerial position? Have him keep an eye out for entry level jobs and within a year or so he can pull strings to get you promoted into his old job, too.

And I find myself caring about that less and less as I get older, if only because when the price for lying is so much a potential risk, and more of an ethics issue that you may be able to fudge your way out of at that— particularly in entry-level fields— and the alternative is a $0 price point on your time and labor? Spin that fucking roulette wheel, my money’s on black, son.

And I’m adding this as an entire separate point, even though it’s a response to overly job-specific derailing, but fourthly: don’t make me fucking laugh about barista positions as “elite.” I want one. I want the fuck out of one. I miss the work, I miss the tips, I miss the free coffee, and I miss that the place where I worked was relatively chill. Unfortunately for me, it’s a nice job to have, in a setting that’s also associated with the academic èlite, artist types, high-minded bourgeoisie, and prices excluding (or alienating) most social “Undesirables” from setting foot inside— and other people (remember those surprised-to-be-in-a-depression hipsters I mentioned?) have cottoned on to that as well.

Volunteers quickly become a liability in the morning rush, just in comped drinks and dropped scones and too much whipped cream alone, let alone if they injure themselves or if money should go missing, or even in the man-hours it takes away from one of your paid employee’s productivity in hawk-eying the new kid’s work. One of my coworkers? The one who ended up stalking me? Harassed my other coworkers for months to hire him as a barista in training, and, yeah, he pulled shitty espresso— most everybody does when they start out, and if it comes down to it, those are quick corrections that can be made if you’re observant enough— but his main issue was wasting food, giving shit to his friends for free/at a discount/off-menu because, hey, those ingredients are expensive and you’re fucking up inventory, and that he didn’t want to fucking clean at the end of the night. A hundred dollars went missing when he was cashiering, and one night he was counting out his drawer before the café closed and walked away from it with customers still in the shop. He lied to people and was a bully. That wasn’t because he was a new barista. It was because he felt entitled to a job he didn’t actually want to do on the basis of his hanging out a lot.

In fact, I was hired at the same time as him— with zero food prep experience, but plenty of cashiering work under my belt, and I drilled coffee recipes every day because I couldn’t afford to be fired, and I aggressively Googled and Wikipediaed and YouTubed and faked it as hard as I could until I knew what I was talking about. I was fast with change and most folks can’t taste dead shots in a glorified caramel milkshake, anyway, and I charmed my ass off and busted my chops, and, yeah, that was with nepotism involved, plus that I was willing and available to work Sundays and ass-long no-tipping closing shifts. In a mom and pop shop where nothing was push-button easy.

LIE. LIE. LIE. I would rather you lie at a chain store, especially if they’re taking this kind of attitude and they are a push-button operation, but seriously: if it comes down to it, you trained on different equipment, your recipes were different, your beans and syrups were different, your POS was actually touchscreen and this is an analog register, you worked at a Dunkin Donuts and did just press a button to steam milk, we called that drink a different name, you’re having an off day (believe it or not, even with experience, shit happens, hence the old applauding at bussers when they drop dishes joke). So you spill a carafe of coffee. That’s not a fireable offense, and even if it was, you have a job to be fired from, so you’re still one step ahead of “unemployed and unemployable.”

Whatever you do, don’t make other people their money for free (esp. when they may v. well also deny you any tips on the basis of your non-employment).

Miss me with that.

yeeeeep.  when i was working at regal cinemas they kept asking if i wanted to be a projectionist and i always said no bc regal calls projectionists ‘booth managers’ because managers don’t have union mandated starting wages at double or better than minimum wage.  being a proj would have been an extra //twenty five cents an hour// with the added responsibility that if anything goes wrong in the booths //it is your responsibility//.  fuuuuuuck that.

P. All the sequels/remakes/adaptations/rip-offs in movies nowadays, good or bad?

it’s a popular conceit that these things are worse today than they have ever been, but it’s a dishonest one.

all the great classic movies were adapted from a play or a book or a fairy tale: gone with the wind, wizard of oz, all the biblical epics, every disney movie. the brothers grimm were the disney of their day, homogenizing extant folklore into the modern ‘classic’ versions. and hollywood has been making terrible sequels since dracula in the 30s, and that all just flowed out of the old serials like flash gordon, to say nothing of radio (or the pulps or //books//).

the studios have been making competing versions of the same idea for as long as there have //been// studios, and the ‘original’ take was never automagically the best one. and they’ve been remaking all their best ideas every ten years the whole time. now in color, now in 3d, now with that hot young actor you like, now with a black friend bc we’re not racist anymore.

every five to ten years there’s a gigantically successful movie with an original idea (often still a remake mashup adaptation etc) which //everyone// sees, then everyone copies the wrong bits trying to echo that success, then what actually made it new and different becomes the norm, then something else comes along. it’s a dialogue and it’s ongoing and it has been the whole time.

what’s your favorite adaptation of the christmas carol, a book published //one hundred and sixty nine years ago//? bc mine stars kermit the frog and michael caine.

nyarlathotep - questions (from a high schooler)

wanted this pulled out where i can find it again.